![]() |
|
—— Ashley Scott---USA
—— Anna Diop---United Kingdom
Gear Modification: The Logic of Performance Optimization from Theory to Practice
Modification Types: Targeted Solutions to Transmission Pain Points
C_β = 0.5×10⁻³b + 0.02mₙ
(where b is the tooth width and mₙ is the normal module). During design, it is also necessary to clarify the position of the crowning center in the axial direction, which usually needs to match the maximum deformation area under actual load.
Meshing Contact Analysis: A Scientific Evaluation Method for Modification Effects
Contact Mechanics Models and Analytical Methods
Analytical method: High calculation efficiency but limited accuracy, suitable for rapid estimation in the initial stage of the scheme.
Finite element method: Can finely simulate micro-deformation of the tooth surface, making it the first choice for detailed analysis of complex structures.
Boundary element method: Has significant advantages in calculating contact stress concentration areas.
Multi-body dynamics: Can simulate the dynamic meshing process of the entire system and evaluate the impact of transmission errors on system vibration.
Engineering Practice: Scenario-Based Application of Modification Technology
Verification of Modification Effects in Typical Scenarios
Practical Path of Engineering Optimization